A political source said that the insistence of the Amal and Hezbollah duo on their position does not mean that Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri has a tendency to form a political front that opposes the “Framework Agreement” and calls for its overthrow, similar to the one that was formed to overthrow the May 17 agreement, because the current political conditions are not favorable and differ from the local and international conditions that prevailed at the time and led to its overthrow. He has control over the government, refusing to use the street to bring it down because he does not want to take the country to a dead end, and this is what lies behind his insistence on the government remaining. The political source pointed out that the presence of ministers affiliated with Berri in the government means that his sponsorship of forming a front opposed to the “Framework Agreement” calling for his overthrow is not on the table, at least, from his point of view, because he does not want to involve the country in the game of axes to block the path to sectarian division and lure the country into entering into strife that it does not want, and he confronts every attempt intended to raise the level of political tension with a sectarian dimension. Berri told his visitors that “stability was and remains a trust of mine, stressing that he neglected it, and that attacking the army commander, General Rudolf Heikal, leads to the ruin of the country, and that the “framework agreement” will not see its way to implementation,” without demanding its overthrow, unlike his ally, Hezbollah, which means, from the point of view of observers, that he is ready to reach a settlement with President Joseph Aoun through which he looks forward to introducing amendments to it, most notably the judiciary’s adoption of an experimental model for deploying the army instead of experimental areas, and setting a timetable. for Israel's withdrawal.